BEDY vs. SPYV
BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. BEDY is actively managed, while SPYV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
BEDY vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.54% return.
BEDY
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 19.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
BEDY vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 12.38% | 1.45% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.54% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDY and SPYV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDY vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
BEDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYV
BEDY vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDY | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDY vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDY | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -58.45% | +52.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -1.17% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -8.70% | +7.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
BEDY vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDY | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 9.94% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.07% | 14.37% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.07% | 16.92% | -4.85% |
BEDY vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDY vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than SPYV's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.30% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDY and SPYV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BEDY.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 1.73% for SPYV.
BEDY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.04% for SPYV.
Find the right allocation for BEDY and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer