BE vs. CRWV

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) are both stocks. BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CRWV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, BE returned 1126.01% vs -26.16% for CRWV. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BE vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 223.26% return, which is significantly higher than CRWV's 63.43% return.

BE

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 223.26%
• 6M: 220.60%
• 1Y: 1,126.01%
• 3Y*: 153.90%
• 5Y*: 62.37%
• 10Y*: —

CRWV

• 1D: 9.67%
• 1M: 9.07%
• YTD: 63.43%
• 6M: 68.39%
• 1Y: -26.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BE vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BE Bloom Energy Corporation	223.26%	295.13%
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.	63.43%	83.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BE and CRWV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap BE : $89.80B CRWV : $61.67B
EPS BE : $0.02 CRWV : -$3.27
PS Ratio BE : 30.13 CRWV : 9.15
PB Ratio BE : 97.45 CRWV : 12.96
Total Revenue (TTM) BE : $2.45B CRWV : $6.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) BE : $761.91M CRWV : $4.32B
EBITDA (TTM) BE : $88.83M CRWV : $1.89B

Return for Risk

BE vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE

BE Risk / Return Rank: 99
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CRWV

CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 32
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BE vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BE	CRWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.58	-0.28	+10.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.97	0.22	+4.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.03	+0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.78	-0.40	+25.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	76.82	-0.59	+77.41

BE vs. CRWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 10.58, which is higher than the CRWV Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and CRWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BE vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than CRWV's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and CRWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BE	CRWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.54%	-64.84%	-27.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.94%	-64.84%	+18.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.77%	-36.25%	+27.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.87%	-37.23%	-14.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.80%	44.26%	-29.46%

Volatility

BE vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 26.35% compared to CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) at 24.18%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BE	CRWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.35%	24.18%	+2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.09%	68.14%	+5.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	107.65%	95.00%	+12.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.00%	113.88%	-27.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.65%	113.88%	-18.23%

Dividends

BE vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison

Neither BE nor CRWV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BE vs. CRWV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and CoreWeave, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

CRWV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

CRWV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

CRWV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -740.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of -35.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BE and CRWV in my portfolio?

BE and CRWV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BE or CRWV?

BE has higher volatility (26.35%) compared to CRWV (24.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs CRWV's -64.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.58 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.