BDYN vs. NZAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BDYN is actively managed, while NZAC is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.

Performance

BDYN vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than NZAC's 8.83% return.

BDYN

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 8.12%
• 6M: 8.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NZAC

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDYN vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	8.12%	3.68%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	8.83%	3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BDYN and NZAC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.96

BDYN vs. NZAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDYN	NZAC
Technology	30.5%	34.3%
Financial Services	11.6%	13.1%
Industrials	10.8%	7.3%
Communication Services	10.0%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	8.2%
Healthcare	9.3%	7.8%
Energy	5.7%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	1.0%
Utilities	2.5%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	5.2%

Return for Risk

BDYN vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 56
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDYN vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDYN	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.61	+0.61

Drawdowns

BDYN vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDYN	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.85%	-33.72%	+22.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.82%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-5.32%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDYN	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.17%	12.94%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.17%	16.81%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.17%	17.14%	-2.97%

BDYN vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDYN vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than NZAC's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	2.01%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.04%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDYN and NZAC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, BDYN and NZAC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BDYN or NZAC?

On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDYN or NZAC?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDYN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDYN or NZAC?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 2.01% for BDYN.

What is the main difference between BDYN and NZAC?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.12% for NZAC.