BDYN vs. NRGU
BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BDYN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while NRGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index. BDYN is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.
Performance
BDYN vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 113.43% return.
BDYN
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- -9.74%
- 1M
- 26.70%
- 6M
- 38.13%
- YTD
- 113.43%
- 1Y
- 116.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.34M | $9.91M | $9.90M | |
| $4.51M | $4.31M | $3.75M |
BDYN vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 10.64% | 3.61% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 113.43% | -8.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDYN and NRGU is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.21 |
BDYN vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDYN
NRGU
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
BDYN
NRGU
-
Industrials
BDYN
NRGU
-
Financial Services
BDYN
NRGU
-
Healthcare
BDYN
NRGU
-
Communication Services
BDYN
NRGU
-
Consumer Cyclical
BDYN
NRGU
-
Energy
BDYN
NRGU
Consumer Defensive
BDYN
NRGU
-
Utilities
BDYN
NRGU
-
Basic Materials
BDYN
NRGU
-
Real Estate
BDYN
NRGU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDYN vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
BDYN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NRGU
BDYN vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDYN | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDYN vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and NRGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDYN | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -57.50% | +46.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -43.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.39% | +26.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -25.70% | +23.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.64% | — |
Volatility
BDYN vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDYN | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 77.95% | -63.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 88.71% | -73.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 88.71% | -73.80% |
BDYN vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDYN vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 1.97% | 2.18% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDYN and NRGU have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDYN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDYN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.
BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.
BDYN is categorized as Global Equities, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.95% for NRGU.
Find the right allocation for BDYN and NRGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer