PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDX vs. GWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDX vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDX achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 29.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BDX has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 2.97%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.17% annualized return.


BDX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
1.32%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
-7.20%
5Y*
-2.73%
10Y*
2.97%

GWW

1D
0.35%
1M
5.96%
YTD
29.79%
6M
36.56%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
24.53%
10Y*
21.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDX vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
-1.06%-12.61%-5.38%-2.67%5.08%1.88%-6.75%22.20%6.61%31.24%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
29.79%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BDX and GWW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1987

0.29

The correlation between BDX and GWW shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDX:

$42.09B

GWW:

$61.84B

EPS

BDX:

$3.99

GWW:

$37.26

PE Ratio

BDX:

37.61

GWW:

35.01

PS Ratio

BDX:

2.00

GWW:

3.39

PB Ratio

BDX:

1.74

GWW:

15.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDX:

$21.37B

GWW:

$18.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDX:

$9.93B

GWW:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

BDX:

$4.16B

GWW:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDX vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDX
BDX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDX vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDXGWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.18

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.36

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

2.60

-1.28

BDX vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDX and GWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDXGWWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.82

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

1.00

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.74

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.56

-0.14

Drawdowns

BDX vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDX drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, smaller than the maximum GWW drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDX and GWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDXGWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-56.73%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.73%

-15.00%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.06%

-24.50%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.06%

-24.50%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.06%

-41.60%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.13%

0.00%

-29.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.58%

-11.01%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.52%

8.29%

+1.23%

Volatility

BDX vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 4.56%. This indicates that BDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDXGWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

4.56%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

18.19%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.03%

24.80%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

24.67%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.58%

28.54%

-4.96%

Dividends

BDX vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

BDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than GWW's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
2.34%2.15%1.71%1.51%1.38%1.34%1.28%1.14%1.34%1.37%1.64%1.60%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.71%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%

Financials

BDX vs. GWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Becton, Dickinson and Company and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.71B
4.74B
(BDX) Total Revenue
(GWW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BDX vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Becton, Dickinson and Company and W.W. Grainger, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
45.7%
40.0%
Portfolio components
BDX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 4.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

BDX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported an operating income of 94.00M and revenue of 4.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

BDX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a net income of -311.00M and revenue of 4.71B, resulting in a net margin of -6.6%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDX and GWW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDX has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to GWW (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDX dropped -51.17% vs GWW's -56.73%.

GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDX and GWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer