BDX vs. ABT
Compare and contrast key facts about Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDX or ABT.
Correlation
The correlation between BDX and ABT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BDX vs. ABT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BDX:
0.17
ABT:
0.09
BDX:
0.36
ABT:
0.26
BDX:
1.04
ABT:
1.03
BDX:
0.15
ABT:
0.06
BDX:
0.60
ABT:
0.20
BDX:
5.06%
ABT:
8.15%
BDX:
17.83%
ABT:
18.10%
BDX:
-51.17%
ABT:
-45.66%
BDX:
-14.23%
ABT:
-14.69%
Fundamentals
BDX:
$68.84B
ABT:
$196.83B
BDX:
$5.89
ABT:
$3.29
BDX:
40.30
ABT:
34.49
BDX:
1.08
ABT:
2.20
BDX:
$15.47B
ABT:
$30.98B
BDX:
$7.10B
ABT:
$17.29B
BDX:
$3.23B
ABT:
$7.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDX achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BDX has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 7.04%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.
BDX
4.63%
6.05%
3.79%
2.34%
-1.14%
7.04%
ABT
0.85%
1.47%
12.34%
0.97%
6.87%
12.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BDX vs. ABT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BDX
ABT
BDX vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BDX vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison
BDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than ABT's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDX Becton, Dickinson and Company | 1.64% | 1.71% | 1.51% | 1.38% | 1.34% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.61% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 1.97% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
BDX vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDX drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDX and ABT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BDX vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is 3.78%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that BDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BDX vs. ABT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Becton, Dickinson and Company and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities