BDVL vs. SLV
BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BDVL is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDVL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
BDVL vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -21.78% return.
BDVL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -20.51%
- 6M
- -39.52%
- YTD
- -21.78%
- 1Y
- 46.44%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
BDVL vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 5.75% | 2.20% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -21.78% | 68.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVL and SLV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDVL vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
BDVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLV
BDVL vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDVL | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDVL vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVL | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -76.28% | +68.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -52.28% | +51.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -44.67% | +43.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.22% | — |
Volatility
BDVL vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDVL | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 61.12% | -51.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.48% | 36.88% | -27.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.48% | 32.18% | -22.70% |
BDVL vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDVL vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 3.52% | 2.79% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDVL and SLV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
BDVL is categorized as Global Equities, while SLV is Silver. BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for BDVL and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer