BDVL vs. SLV
BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BDVL is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDVL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
BDVL vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return.
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
BDVL vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.71% | 1.97% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 66.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVL and SLV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.38 |
BDVL vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDVL
SLV
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
BDVL
SLV
-
Industrials
BDVL
SLV
-
Financial Services
BDVL
SLV
-
Healthcare
BDVL
SLV
-
Communication Services
BDVL
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
BDVL
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
BDVL
SLV
-
Utilities
BDVL
SLV
-
Energy
BDVL
SLV
-
Basic Materials
BDVL
SLV
Real Estate
BDVL
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDVL vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
BDVL
SLV
BDVL vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDVL | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.25 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
BDVL vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVL | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -76.28% | +68.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -37.30% | +36.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -44.67% | +43.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.67% | — |
Volatility
BDVL vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDVL | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 58.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 58.90% | -49.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 36.15% | -26.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 31.84% | -22.35% |
BDVL vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDVL vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.66% | 2.79% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDVL and SLV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
BDVL is categorized as Global Equities, while SLV is Silver. BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for BDVL and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer