BDIV vs. TIIV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BDIV (AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF) and TIIV (AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AAM, while TIIV is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by AAM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BDIV returned 20.14% vs 31.35% for TIIV. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for TIIV.

Performance

BDIV vs. TIIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDIV achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than TIIV's 14.51% return.

BDIV

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 7.69%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 1Y: 20.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.95%

TIIV

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.74%
• 6M: 7.67%
• YTD: 14.51%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF	$66.95K	$59.67K	$64.41K
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	$20.24K	$14.96K	$74.75K

BDIV vs. TIIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF	10.04%	7.10%
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	14.51%	10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BDIV and TIIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.72

The correlation between BDIV and TIIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BDIV vs. TIIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BDIV

BDIV Risk / Return Rank: 83
BDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

TIIV

TIIV Risk / Return Rank: 85
TIIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TIIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TIIV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TIIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TIIV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BDIV vs. TIIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDIV	TIIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.10	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.05	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.39	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.14	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.97	10.95	+0.02

BDIV vs. TIIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the TIIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDIV and TIIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BDIV vs. TIIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDIV drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than TIIV's maximum drawdown of -9.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV and TIIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDIV	TIIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-9.68%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-9.68%	+2.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.12%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-1.78%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	2.77%	-1.01%

Volatility

BDIV vs. TIIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is 2.46%, while AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that BDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDIV	TIIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	3.91%	-1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.15%	12.07%	-4.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.69%	14.50%	-4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.06%	14.52%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.06%	14.52%	-1.46%

BDIV vs. TIIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TIIV's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDIV vs. TIIV - Dividend Comparison

BDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than TIIV's 3.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF	1.55%	1.14%	0.62%
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	3.11%	2.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDIV and TIIV in my portfolio?

BDIV and TIIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDIV or TIIV?

TIIV has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to BDIV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDIV dropped -14.98% vs TIIV's -9.68%.

Which ETF is better, BDIV or TIIV?

On 1-year performance, TIIV leads with 31.35% vs 20.14% for BDIV. On fees, BDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDIV or TIIV?

Over the 1-year period, TIIV has performed better with a 31.35% return vs 20.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDIV or TIIV?

BDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDIV or TIIV?

TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.55% for BDIV.

What is the main difference between BDIV and TIIV?

BDIV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TIIV is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BDIV and 0.54% for TIIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.