BDIV vs. DFRA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA).

BDIV and DFRA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDIV is an actively managed fund by AAM. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024. DFRA is a passively managed fund by Donoghue Forlines that tracks the performance of the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021.

Performance

BDIV vs. DFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BDIV vs. DFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF	0.20%	18.59%	3.14%
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	10.68%	6.64%	-3.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDIV achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than DFRA's 10.68% return.

BDIV

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -4.89%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFRA

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -5.53%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 11.86%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDIV vs. DFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DFRA's 0.69% expense ratio.

DFRA

Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF

BDIV

AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF

Return for Risk

BDIV vs. DFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDIV

BDIV Risk / Return Rank: 66
BDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DFRA

DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 42
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDIV vs. DFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDIV	DFRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.87	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	1.28	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.18	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.12	+0.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.00	4.52	+3.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDIV vs. DFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the DFRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDIV and DFRA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDIV	DFRA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	0.87	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.73	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between BDIV and DFRA is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BDIV vs. DFRA - Dividend Comparison

BDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than DFRA's 4.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF	1.14%	1.14%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	4.12%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%

Drawdowns

BDIV vs. DFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDIV drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum DFRA drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV and DFRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDIV	DFRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-19.35%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-14.67%	+4.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.20%	-5.53%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-3.91%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	3.63%	-1.41%

Volatility

BDIV vs. DFRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is 3.84%, while Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that BDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDIV	DFRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	6.81%	-2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	11.88%	-4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	18.56%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.70%	17.59%	-3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.70%	17.59%	-3.89%