BDIV vs. SAWS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BDIV (AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF) and SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AAM, while SAWS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AAM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BDIV returned 20.14% vs 30.13% for SAWS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SAWS.

Performance

BDIV vs. SAWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDIV achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than SAWS's 19.49% return.

BDIV

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 6M: 7.37%
• 1Y: 20.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAWS

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 8.58%
• YTD: 19.49%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 30.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDIV vs. SAWS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF	7.77%	18.59%	3.01%
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF	19.49%	7.26%	4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BDIV and SAWS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024	0.75

The correlation between BDIV and SAWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

BDIV vs. SAWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDIV	SAWS
Technology	22.6%	16.1%
Financial Services	14.7%	12.1%
Industrials	13.1%	25.3%
Healthcare	10.3%	21.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.6%
Utilities	6.8%	-
Communication Services	6.5%	0.7%
Energy	5.9%	5.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	8.9%
Basic Materials	4.5%	2.9%
Real Estate	3.3%	-

Return for Risk

BDIV vs. SAWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDIV

BDIV Risk / Return Rank: 69
BDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

SAWS

SAWS Risk / Return Rank: 56
SAWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SAWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SAWS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SAWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SAWS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDIV vs. SAWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDIV	SAWS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.63	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	2.44	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.28	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.96	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	9.65	+1.81

BDIV vs. SAWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the SAWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDIV and SAWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BDIV vs. SAWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDIV drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum SAWS drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV and SAWS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDIV	SAWS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-22.04%	+7.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-10.23%	+3.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-0.91%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.95%	-5.47%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	3.13%	-1.37%

Volatility

BDIV vs. SAWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is 2.51%, while AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that BDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDIV	SAWS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	5.34%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	14.14%	-6.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.71%	18.56%	-8.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.30%	21.02%	-7.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.30%	21.02%	-7.72%

BDIV vs. SAWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SAWS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDIV vs. SAWS - Dividend Comparison

BDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than SAWS's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF	1.58%	1.14%	0.62%
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDIV and SAWS in my portfolio?

BDIV and SAWS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDIV or SAWS?

SAWS has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to BDIV (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDIV dropped -14.98% vs SAWS's -22.04%.

Which ETF is better, BDIV or SAWS?

On 1-year performance, SAWS leads with 30.13% vs 20.14% for BDIV. On fees, BDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDIV or SAWS?

Over the 1-year period, SAWS has performed better with a 30.13% return vs 20.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDIV or SAWS?

BDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SAWS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDIV or SAWS?

BDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.02% for SAWS.

What is the main difference between BDIV and SAWS?

BDIV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SAWS is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BDIV and 0.55% for SAWS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.