PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDGS vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDGS vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDGS achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.


BDGS

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.26%
YTD
5.64%
6M
5.65%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDGS vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
5.64%6.66%
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.45%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BDGS and BUFH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDGS vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDGS vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDGSBUFHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.47

BDGS vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDGSBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.76

2.91

-1.15

Drawdowns

BDGS vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDGS drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGS and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDGSBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-1.53%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.05%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-0.18%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

Volatility

BDGS vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDGSBUFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

2.37%

+3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

2.37%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

2.37%

+5.84%

BDGS vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDGS vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.52%0.55%1.81%0.84%
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDGS and BUFH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDGS is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

BDGS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bridges and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDGS and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDGS and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer