BDCZ vs. FBGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) and FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while FBGX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for FBGX.

Performance

BDCZ vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BDCZ

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -7.44%
• YTD: -7.98%
• 6M: -8.99%
• 1Y: -10.32%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: 6.23%

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCZ vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN	-7.98%	-3.72%	12.22%	25.31%	-9.12%	33.97%	-10.95%	26.00%	-7.64%	0.40%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	35.73%	83.74%	-56.41%	57.04%	65.79%	75.84%	-16.58%	64.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCZ and FBGX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015	0.32

The correlation between BDCZ and FBGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BDCZ vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCZ

BDCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BDCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCZ vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDCZ	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDCZ	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BDCZ	FBGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.27%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDCZ	FBGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.42%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.80%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	—	—

BDCZ vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDCZ vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN	11.28%	10.65%	9.26%	9.13%	9.39%	7.49%	10.01%	8.40%	9.66%	8.74%	7.98%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDCZ and FBGX in my portfolio?

BDCZ and FBGX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDCZ or FBGX?

On fees, BDCZ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDCZ or FBGX?

BDCZ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDCZ or FBGX?

BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.28%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.

What is the main difference between BDCZ and FBGX?

BDCZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while FBGX is Leveraged Equities. BDCZ tracks BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDCZ and 1.29% for FBGX.