PortfoliosLab logo
BDCZ vs. MLPR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BDCZ and MLPR is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BDCZ vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BDCZ:

-0.13

MLPR:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

BDCZ:

-0.02

MLPR:

0.69

Omega Ratio

BDCZ:

1.00

MLPR:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

BDCZ:

-0.09

MLPR:

0.48

Martin Ratio

BDCZ:

-0.33

MLPR:

1.68

Ulcer Index

BDCZ:

5.37%

MLPR:

7.02%

Daily Std Dev

BDCZ:

17.94%

MLPR:

31.38%

Max Drawdown

BDCZ:

-55.62%

MLPR:

-48.98%

Current Drawdown

BDCZ:

-11.85%

MLPR:

-15.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCZ achieves a -5.59% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 1.94% return.


BDCZ

YTD

-5.59%

1M

1.36%

6M

-2.11%

1Y

-2.26%

5Y*

17.45%

10Y*

N/A

MLPR

YTD

1.94%

1M

4.70%

6M

7.75%

1Y

10.55%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BDCZ vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDCZ vs. MLPR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDCZ is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDCZ is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDCZ is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDCZ is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDCZ is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDCZ is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLPR is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLPR is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLPR is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLPR is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLPR is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLPR is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDCZ vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BDCZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the MLPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCZ and MLPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BDCZ vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, less than MLPR's 10.67% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
BDCZ
ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN
10.36%9.26%9.13%11.66%7.49%10.01%8.39%9.66%8.75%7.98%
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
10.67%9.57%10.08%10.07%10.69%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BDCZ vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCZ drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, which is greater than MLPR's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCZ and MLPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BDCZ vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...