PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDBKX vs. FSOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBKX achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly higher than FSOPX's 16.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BDBKX has underperformed FSOPX with an annualized return of 11.18%, while FSOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


BDBKX

1D
0.92%
1M
4.99%
YTD
18.66%
6M
17.35%
1Y
41.13%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
11.18%

FSOPX

1D
0.85%
1M
1.12%
YTD
16.83%
6M
15.66%
1Y
40.89%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
18.66%12.81%11.40%17.04%-20.32%14.59%20.02%25.66%-11.01%14.71%
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
16.83%15.81%15.31%20.38%-17.82%23.39%17.03%29.92%-8.12%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBKX and FSOPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.97

The correlation between BDBKX and FSOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDBKX vs. FSOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDBKX
BDBKX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BDBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BDBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOPX
FSOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FSOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDBKXFSOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

4.35

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

17.03

-2.93

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDBKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FSOPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDBKX and FSOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDBKXFSOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.42

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.51

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Drawdowns

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBKX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum FSOPX drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBKX and FSOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDBKXFSOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.66%

-61.75%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-9.99%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.53%

-27.17%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.96%

-30.06%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.66%

-39.15%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.66%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-10.37%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.54%

+0.54%

Volatility

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) at 5.26%. This indicates that BDBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDBKXFSOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.26%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

13.46%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.09%

17.92%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.17%

21.70%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

21.99%

+1.72%

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBKX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOPX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BDBKX vs. FSOPX - Dividend Comparison

BDBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than FSOPX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
2.67%3.17%4.84%2.96%1.76%7.67%1.45%3.47%4.29%3.18%4.62%3.64%
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
3.78%4.41%9.41%0.98%5.16%30.85%2.01%6.67%13.99%10.31%0.69%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BDBKX and FSOPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BDBKX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to FSOPX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDBKX dropped -41.66% vs FSOPX's -61.75%.

FSOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDBKX and FSOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer