PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDBKX vs. BDOKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K (BDOKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
0.90%12.81%11.40%17.04%-20.32%14.59%20.02%25.66%-11.01%14.71%
BDOKX
iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K
1.15%32.56%5.37%15.26%-16.40%7.68%10.77%23.11%-13.91%26.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBKX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than BDOKX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, BDBKX has outperformed BDOKX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while BDOKX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.67% annualized return.


BDBKX

1D
3.44%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
0.90%
6M
2.84%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
9.86%

BDOKX

1D
2.41%
1M
-7.58%
YTD
1.15%
6M
5.19%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBKX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BDOKX's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BDBKX vs. BDOKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDBKX
BDBKX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BDBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BDBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BDOKX
BDOKX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BDOKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDOKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDOKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BDOKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDOKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K (BDOKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDBKXBDOKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.62

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

2.17

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.23

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.77

8.67

-1.90

BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDBKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the BDOKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDBKX and BDOKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDBKXBDOKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.62

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.46

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.54

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.34

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between BDBKX and BDOKX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Dividend Comparison

BDBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than BDOKX's 2.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
3.15%3.17%4.84%2.96%1.76%7.67%1.45%3.47%4.29%3.18%4.62%3.64%
BDOKX
iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K
2.30%3.01%2.84%2.94%2.84%3.01%1.98%4.48%3.28%1.81%3.51%3.87%

Drawdowns

BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBKX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than BDOKX's maximum drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBKX and BDOKX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BDBKXBDOKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.66%

-34.22%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-11.38%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.96%

-30.23%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.66%

-34.22%

-7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.90%

-9.24%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-8.30%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

2.93%

+0.77%

Volatility

BDBKX vs. BDOKX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K (BDOKX) have volatilities of 7.51% and 7.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BDBKXBDOKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

7.64%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.50%

11.13%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

16.30%

+7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.20%

15.24%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

16.18%

+7.49%