PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSOPX vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOPX achieves a 16.83% return, which is significantly higher than FSMD's 14.85% return.


FSOPX

1D
0.85%
1M
1.12%
YTD
16.83%
6M
15.66%
1Y
40.89%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.77%

FSMD

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.46%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.81%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
16.83%15.81%15.31%20.38%-17.82%23.39%17.03%11.80%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
14.85%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FSOPX and FSMD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FSOPX and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSOPX vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSOPX
FSOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FSOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSOPXFSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

3.06

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.03

11.03

+6.01

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSOPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSOPX and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSOPXFSMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.69

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Drawdowns

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOPX drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOPX and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSOPXFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.75%

-40.67%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-8.44%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.17%

-22.16%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.06%

-22.16%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.08%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-6.00%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.34%

+0.20%

Volatility

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 4.45%. This indicates that FSOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSOPXFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.45%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

11.37%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

15.26%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

18.48%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

21.42%

+0.57%

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSOPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSOPX vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

FSOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FSMD's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.21%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
3.78%4.41%9.41%0.98%5.16%30.85%2.01%6.67%13.99%10.31%0.69%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FSOPX and FSMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSOPX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to FSMD (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSOPX dropped -61.75% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

FSOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSOPX and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer