PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDBKX vs. BKIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBKX achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than BKIPX's 2.00% return.


BDBKX

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.41%
YTD
17.58%
6M
18.53%
1Y
42.04%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
11.08%

BKIPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.13%
YTD
2.00%
6M
2.06%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
17.58%12.81%11.40%17.04%-20.32%14.59%20.02%25.66%-11.01%14.01%
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
2.00%6.08%4.77%3.37%-4.18%5.21%4.86%4.90%0.61%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBKX and BKIPX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.06

The correlation between BDBKX and BKIPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDBKX vs. BKIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDBKX
BDBKX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BDBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BDBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIPX
BKIPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BKIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDBKXBKIPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

1.99

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

3.99

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

3.80

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.56

17.13

-3.57

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDBKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the BKIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDBKX and BKIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDBKXBKIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.99

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.91

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.13

-0.70

Drawdowns

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBKX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than BKIPX's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBKX and BKIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDBKXBKIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.66%

-6.42%

-35.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-1.32%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.53%

-1.32%

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.96%

-6.42%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

0.00%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-1.07%

-7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

0.29%

+2.79%

Volatility

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) at 1.23%. This indicates that BDBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDBKXBKIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

1.23%

+4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

1.76%

+11.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

2.28%

+16.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.16%

3.12%

+20.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

2.64%

+21.07%

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBKX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIPX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BDBKX vs. BKIPX - Dividend Comparison

BDBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than BKIPX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
2.70%3.17%4.84%2.96%1.76%7.67%1.45%3.47%4.29%3.18%4.62%3.64%
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
4.63%4.68%4.33%2.77%4.80%4.41%1.17%2.54%2.56%1.90%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDBKX and BKIPX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDBKX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to BKIPX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDBKX dropped -41.66% vs BKIPX's -6.42%.

BDBKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDBKX and BKIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer