BDBKX vs. BSPGX
BDBKX (iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K) and BSPGX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G) are both mutual funds - BDBKX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while BSPGX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDBKX returned 7.35%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for BSPGX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BDBKX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for BSPGX.
Performance
BDBKX vs. BSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDBKX achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than BSPGX's 10.18% return.
BDBKX
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 43.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
BSPGX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 27.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- —
BDBKX vs. BSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDBKX iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K | 20.72% | 12.81% | 11.40% | 17.04% | -20.32% | 14.59% | 20.02% | 7.15% |
BSPGX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G | 10.18% | 17.85% | 24.96% | 26.27% | -18.12% | 28.66% | 19.16% | 11.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDBKX and BSPGX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between BDBKX and BSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDBKX vs. BSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
BDBKX
BSPGX
BDBKX vs. BSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDBKX | BSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.03 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.86 | 13.72 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDBKX vs. BSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDBKX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than BSPGX's maximum drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBKX and BSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDBKX | BSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -33.74% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.97% | -8.90% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.53% | -18.73% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.96% | -24.50% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.36% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -5.06% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.96% | +1.13% |
Volatility
BDBKX vs. BSPGX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX) at 4.77%. This indicates that BDBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDBKX | BSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 4.77% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 9.90% | +4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.66% | 12.47% | +7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 16.98% | +6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 20.01% | +3.75% |
BDBKX vs. BSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDBKX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BSPGX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BDBKX vs. BSPGX - Dividend Comparison
BDBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than BSPGX's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDBKX iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K | 2.63% | 3.17% | 4.84% | 2.96% | 1.76% | 7.67% | 1.45% | 3.47% | 4.29% | 3.18% | 4.62% | 3.64% |
BSPGX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G | 1.60% | 1.74% | 1.43% | 1.52% | 2.04% | 1.83% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDBKX and BSPGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDBKX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to BSPGX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDBKX dropped -41.66% vs BSPGX's -33.74%.
BDBKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDBKX and BSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer