PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCX vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCX vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCX achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 24.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BCX has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 12.37%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 20.21% annualized return.


BCX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
12.68%
6M
17.92%
1Y
37.66%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
12.37%

XME

1D
-3.24%
1M
9.89%
YTD
24.13%
6M
29.19%
1Y
103.84%
3Y*
40.26%
5Y*
23.59%
10Y*
20.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCX vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCX
Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust
12.68%40.37%3.18%-4.79%12.80%32.90%0.04%23.80%-22.55%26.76%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
24.13%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BCX and XME is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011

0.64

The correlation between BCX and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCX vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCX
BCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCX vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCXXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

4.62

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

11.75

-4.68

BCX vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCX and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCXXMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

3.02

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.73

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.62

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.18

+0.02

Drawdowns

BCX vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCX drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCX and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCXXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.36%

-85.89%

+23.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-22.60%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-30.47%

+14.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

-37.27%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.23%

-61.69%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-3.24%

-7.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-44.14%

+24.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

8.87%

-3.53%

Volatility

BCX vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) is 5.76%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 12.42%. This indicates that BCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCXXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

12.42%

-6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.12%

26.73%

-10.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

34.65%

-16.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

32.54%

-11.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.52%

32.84%

-9.32%

BCX vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCX vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

BCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than XME's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCX
Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust
6.95%7.62%7.49%7.00%5.52%5.13%7.10%7.67%8.77%6.19%6.98%11.38%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.30%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCX and XME have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to BCX (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCX dropped -62.36% vs XME's -85.89%.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCX and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer