BCX vs. PFN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BCX (Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust) and PFN (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II) are both mutual funds - BCX is a Natural Resources fund managed by BlackRock, while PFN is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, BCX returned 11.86%/yr vs 7.84%/yr for PFN. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for PFN.

Performance

BCX vs. PFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than PFN's -3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BCX has outperformed PFN with an annualized return of 11.86%, while PFN has yielded a comparatively lower 7.84% annualized return.

BCX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -4.09%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 9.26%
• 1Y: 31.87%
• 3Y*: 16.91%
• 5Y*: 11.26%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

PFN

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: -3.98%
• 6M: -1.21%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 1.75%
• 10Y*: 7.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCX vs. PFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCX Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust	8.17%	40.37%	3.18%	-4.79%	12.80%	32.90%	0.04%	23.80%	-22.55%	26.76%
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II	-3.98%	13.07%	15.72%	15.43%	-17.65%	5.14%	3.97%	21.84%	0.94%	20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BCX and PFN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2011	0.29

Return for Risk

BCX vs. PFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCX

BCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
BCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
BCX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BCX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PFN

PFN Risk / Return Rank: 6
PFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PFN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PFN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCX vs. PFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCX	PFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	0.47	+1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	0.74	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.09	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	0.44	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.32	1.63	+3.69

BCX vs. PFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the PFN Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCX and PFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCX vs. PFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCX drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, smaller than the maximum PFN drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCX and PFN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCX	PFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.36%	-80.08%	+17.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-10.77%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.17%	-14.31%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.22%	-33.45%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.23%	-45.70%	-13.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.90%	-5.02%	-8.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-11.81%	-7.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	2.92%	+3.09%

Volatility

BCX vs. PFN - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) at 2.81%. This indicates that BCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCX	PFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	2.81%	+2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.30%	9.01%	+7.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.83%	10.16%	+8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.36%	14.64%	+6.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.54%	18.19%	+5.35%

BCX vs. PFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PFN's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCX vs. PFN - Dividend Comparison

BCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than PFN's 12.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCX Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust	7.29%	7.62%	7.49%	7.00%	5.52%	5.13%	7.10%	7.67%	8.77%	6.19%	6.98%	11.38%
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II	12.71%	11.49%	11.57%	11.92%	12.19%	9.71%	9.67%	9.07%	10.81%	9.20%	10.12%	11.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCX and PFN in my portfolio?

BCX and PFN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCX or PFN?

BCX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to PFN (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCX dropped -62.36% vs PFN's -80.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.