PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSM vs. FCUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCSM vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSM achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 50.06% return.


BCSM

1D
-1.38%
1M
6.09%
YTD
0.41%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FCUS

1D
0.90%
1M
10.76%
YTD
50.06%
6M
52.19%
1Y
96.08%
3Y*
37.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSM vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCSM
Baron SMID Cap ETF
0.41%-0.51%
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
50.06%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSM and FCUS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSM vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSM

FCUS
FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSM vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCSM vs. FCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSMFCUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

1.13

-1.14

Drawdowns

BCSM vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSM drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSM and FCUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSMFCUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-39.89%

+22.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.06%

0.00%

-4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-7.55%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

Volatility

BCSM vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSMFCUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.15%

33.92%

-13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

29.98%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

29.98%

-9.83%

BCSM vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCSM vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison

BCSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.


PositionTTM20252024
BCSM
Baron SMID Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
2.89%4.33%11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCSM and FCUS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCSM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCSM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for BCSM.

They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCSM and 0.79% for FCUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSM and FCUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer