BCSM vs. FCUS
BCSM (Baron SMID Cap ETF) and FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCSM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCUS.
Performance
BCSM vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCSM achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 50.06% return.
BCSM
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCUS
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 50.06%
- 6M
- 52.19%
- 1Y
- 96.08%
- 3Y*
- 37.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCSM vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCSM Baron SMID Cap ETF | 0.41% | -0.51% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 50.06% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCSM and FCUS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCSM vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank
BCSM
FCUS
BCSM vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCSM | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 1.13 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
BCSM vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCSM drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSM and FCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCSM | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -39.89% | +22.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | 0.00% | -4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -7.55% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.93% | — |
Volatility
BCSM vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCSM | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 33.92% | -13.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 29.98% | -9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 29.98% | -9.83% |
BCSM vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCSM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCSM vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison
BCSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCSM Baron SMID Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 2.89% | 4.33% | 11.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCSM and FCUS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCSM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCSM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.
FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for BCSM.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCSM and 0.79% for FCUS.
Find the right allocation for BCSM and FCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer