BCSF vs. SMH
BCSF (Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 5 years, BCSF returned 6.86%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for SMH. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCSF vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCSF achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
BCSF
- 1D
- -4.34%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- -6.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
BCSF vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. | -4.96% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 41.95% | -13.31% | 36.98% | -28.91% | 28.19% | -4.60% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCSF and SMH is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2018 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BCSF and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCSF vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
BCSF
SMH
BCSF vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCSF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.72 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 10.59 | -10.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 40.63 | -41.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCSF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 5.19 | -5.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 1.13 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.34 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
BCSF vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCSF drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSF and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCSF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.42% | -84.96% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -14.93% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.38% | -35.74% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -45.30% | +18.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.07% | 0.00% | -21.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -41.09% | +28.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 3.89% | +3.86% |
Volatility
BCSF vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) is 5.97%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that BCSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCSF | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 11.47% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 24.29% | -7.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.42% | 30.56% | -9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 35.01% | -14.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.02% | 32.57% | -1.55% |
Dividends
BCSF vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
BCSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.04%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. | 15.04% | 14.02% | 10.27% | 10.62% | 11.60% | 8.94% | 11.73% | 8.30% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCSF and SMH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to BCSF (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSF dropped -62.42% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCSF and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer