PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSF vs. AMAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BCSF vs. AMAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) and Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSF achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than AMAL's 55.47% return.


BCSF

1D
-0.56%
1M
-1.74%
6M
0.92%
YTD
-4.45%
1Y
-2.89%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.63%

AMAL

1D
-0.02%
1M
7.25%
6M
28.21%
YTD
55.47%
1Y
76.42%
3Y*
38.78%
5Y*
28.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.33M$7.67M$6.82M
$2.80M$3.37M$4.30M

BCSF vs. AMAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.
-4.45%-9.60%29.52%41.95%-13.31%36.98%-28.91%28.19%-4.60%
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
55.47%-2.50%26.32%19.44%39.78%24.43%-27.56%1.22%-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSF and AMAL is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCSF:

$805.67M

AMAL:

$1.47B

EPS

BCSF:

$1.50

AMAL:

$3.75

PE Ratio

BCSF:

8.26

AMAL:

13.17

PS Ratio

BCSF:

3.39

AMAL:

3.08

PB Ratio

BCSF:

0.74

AMAL:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCSF:

$237.34M

AMAL:

$485.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCSF:

$150.81M

AMAL:

$338.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

BCSF:

-$29.62M

AMAL:

$156.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSF vs. AMAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCSF
BCSF Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BCSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSF Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSF Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAL
AMAL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AMAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCSF vs. AMAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) and Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCSFAMALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.39

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

4.64

-4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

13.36

-13.91

BCSF vs. AMAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the AMAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSF and AMAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCSF vs. AMAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSF drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAL drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSF and AMAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSFAMALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.42%

-62.93%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-15.91%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.38%

-32.85%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-46.88%

+20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.65%

-1.02%

-19.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.42%

-19.60%

+7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

5.53%

+2.89%

Volatility

BCSF vs. AMAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) is 6.11%, while Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that BCSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSFAMALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

7.43%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

19.05%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

29.77%

-7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

33.86%

-13.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.85%

39.78%

-8.93%

Dividends

BCSF vs. AMAL - Dividend Comparison

BCSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.22%, more than AMAL's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMAL
Amalgamated Financial Corp.
1.26%1.75%1.37%1.48%1.56%1.91%2.33%1.34%0.31%
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.
15.22%14.02%10.27%10.62%11.60%8.94%11.73%8.30%2.44%

Financials

BCSF vs. AMAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. and Amalgamated Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BCSF vs. AMAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. and Amalgamated Financial Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BCSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 50.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amalgamated Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 93.93M and revenue of 129.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.6%.

BCSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 50.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AMAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amalgamated Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 46.62M and revenue of 129.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

BCSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 27.36M and revenue of 50.13M, resulting in a net margin of 54.6%.

AMAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amalgamated Financial Corp. reported a net income of 34.77M and revenue of 129.47M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCSF and AMAL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAL has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to BCSF (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSF dropped -62.42% vs AMAL's -62.93%.

AMAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSF and AMAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer