BCSF vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Performance

BCSF vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCSF vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.	-7.71%	-9.60%	29.52%	41.95%	-13.31%	36.98%	-28.91%	28.19%	-4.60%
AAPL Apple Inc	-6.56%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-26.40%	34.65%	82.31%	88.96%	-17.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BCSF : $803.78M AAPL : $3.76T
EPS BCSF : $1.87K AAPL : $7.89
PE Ratio BCSF : 0.01 AAPL : 32.15
PEG Ratio BCSF : 0.01 AAPL : 4.23
PS Ratio BCSF : 0.00 AAPL : 8.69
PB Ratio BCSF : 0.00 AAPL : 42.62
Total Revenue (TTM) BCSF : $217.36B AAPL : $435.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) BCSF : $0.00 AAPL : $206.16B
EBITDA (TTM) BCSF : $0.00 AAPL : $150.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSF achieves a -7.71% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -6.56% return.

BCSF

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: -7.71%
• 6M: -5.98%
• 1Y: -14.33%
• 3Y*: 14.05%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: —

AAPL

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -6.56%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 16.20%
• 10Y*: 26.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BCSF vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSF

BCSF Risk / Return Rank: 15
BCSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BCSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BCSF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BCSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BCSF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 59
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSF vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCSF	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	0.47	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.64	0.92	-1.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.13	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	0.74	-1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	2.30	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCSF vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSF and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCSF	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56	0.47	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.59	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.43	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between BCSF and AAPL is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BCSF vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

BCSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.48%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.	15.48%	14.02%	10.27%	10.62%	11.60%	8.94%	11.73%	8.30%	2.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

BCSF vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSF drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSF and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCSF	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.42%	-81.80%	+19.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-22.99%	+4.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	-33.36%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.35%	-11.24%	-12.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-29.71%	+17.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.76%	7.38%	+2.38%

Volatility

BCSF vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.58%. This indicates that BCSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCSF	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.25%	5.58%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.11%	15.09%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.74%	31.66%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.07%	27.46%	-7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.20%	28.94%	+2.26%

Financials

BCSF vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BCSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of -83.07M and revenue of 217.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

BCSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of -73.93M and revenue of 217.22B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.0%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

BCSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 121.53B and revenue of 217.22B, resulting in a net margin of 56.0%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.