PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCRX vs. CERS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BCRX vs. CERS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) and Cerus Corporation (CERS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCRX achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly lower than CERS's 26.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BCRX has outperformed CERS with an annualized return of 12.40%, while CERS has yielded a comparatively lower -8.07% annualized return.


BCRX

1D
1.67%
1M
10.25%
YTD
17.18%
6M
20.11%
1Y
-9.50%
3Y*
9.25%
5Y*
-11.66%
10Y*
12.40%

CERS

1D
-3.70%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
26.21%
6M
22.64%
1Y
94.03%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-14.53%
10Y*
-8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCRX vs. CERS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCRX
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
17.18%3.72%25.54%-47.82%-17.11%85.91%115.94%-57.25%64.36%-22.43%
CERS
Cerus Corporation
26.21%33.77%-28.70%-40.82%-46.40%-1.59%63.98%-16.77%50.00%-22.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BCRX and CERS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 1997

0.25

The correlation between BCRX and CERS shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCRX:

$2.21B

CERS:

$504.77M

EPS

BCRX:

-$2.03

CERS:

-$0.05

PS Ratio

BCRX:

2.33

CERS:

2.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCRX:

$885.72M

CERS:

$216.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCRX:

$167.34M

CERS:

$114.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

BCRX:

-$374.88M

CERS:

-$2.69M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCRX vs. CERS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCRX
BCRX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CERS
CERS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCRX vs. CERS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) and Cerus Corporation (CERS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCRXCERSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.26

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

2.47

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.46

5.71

-6.17

BCRX vs. CERS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCRX Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the CERS Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCRX and CERS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCRX vs. CERS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCRX drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, roughly equal to the maximum CERS drawdown of -99.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCRX and CERS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCRXCERSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.74%

-99.28%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.16%

-38.32%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.85%

-62.21%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.10%

-85.37%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.69%

-86.45%

+2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.41%

-96.77%

+24.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.64%

-81.40%

+11.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.92%

16.53%

+5.39%

Volatility

BCRX vs. CERS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) is 12.92%, while Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a volatility of 15.56%. This indicates that BCRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CERS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCRXCERSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.92%

15.56%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.53%

53.96%

-19.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.94%

75.47%

-30.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.06%

69.80%

-7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.63%

63.20%

+9.43%

Dividends

BCRX vs. CERS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCRX nor CERS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BCRX vs. CERS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Cerus Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
156.41M
53.66M
(BCRX) Total Revenue
(CERS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BCRX and CERS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CERS has higher volatility (15.56%) compared to BCRX (12.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCRX dropped -97.74% vs CERS's -99.28%.

CERS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCRX and CERS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer