PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCRIX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage CoreAlpha Bond Fund (BCRIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCRIX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BCRIX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.


BCRIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.33%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
1.56%

FASGX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.98%
YTD
11.27%
6M
12.13%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCRIX
BlackRock Advantage CoreAlpha Bond Fund
0.17%6.81%2.21%5.07%-14.70%-1.97%8.78%9.33%-0.17%4.17%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.27%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BCRIX and FASGX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2011

-0.01

The correlation between BCRIX and FASGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCRIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCRIX
BCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage CoreAlpha Bond Fund (BCRIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCRIXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.26

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

14.40

-8.96

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCRIX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCRIXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.50

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.67

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.79

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.63

-0.19

Drawdowns

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCRIX drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCRIX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCRIXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-47.35%

+27.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-7.95%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.40%

-12.80%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.05%

-23.54%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.21%

-27.20%

+6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-0.59%

-3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-6.71%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.79%

-0.78%

Volatility

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Advantage CoreAlpha Bond Fund (BCRIX) is 1.30%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that BCRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCRIXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

3.37%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

8.40%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

10.35%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

12.27%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

12.65%

-7.59%

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCRIX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCRIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

BCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, less than FASGX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCRIX
BlackRock Advantage CoreAlpha Bond Fund
4.68%4.59%4.53%3.41%1.85%2.49%6.25%3.75%3.07%2.81%3.21%2.93%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.59%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCRIX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to BCRIX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCRIX dropped -20.21% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCRIX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer