PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCPL vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCPL vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BCPL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.34%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PIT

1D
-1.49%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
39.26%
6M
40.29%
1Y
60.66%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCPL vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCPL and PIT is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

-0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCPL vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCPL

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCPL vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCPL vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCPLPITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.04

-0.61

Drawdowns

BCPL vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCPLPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-12.27%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-5.98%

+4.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-3.99%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

Volatility

BCPL vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCPLPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

21.37%

-17.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

17.48%

-13.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

17.48%

-13.46%

BCPL vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCPL vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than PIT's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BCPL
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF
1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.40%8.92%3.59%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCPL and PIT have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 1.56% for BCPL.

BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.55% for PIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCPL and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer