BCPL vs. PIT
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
BCPL vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIT
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 39.26%
- 6M
- 40.29%
- 1Y
- 60.66%
- 3Y*
- 23.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCPL vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.67% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and PIT is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
PIT
BCPL vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPL | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -12.27% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -5.98% | +4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -3.99% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 21.37% | -17.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 17.48% | -13.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 17.48% | -13.46% |
BCPL vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than PIT's 6.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 6.40% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and PIT have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 1.56% for BCPL.
BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.55% for PIT.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer