BCPL vs. OILT
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and OILT (Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while OILT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross. BCPL is actively managed, while OILT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for OILT.
Performance
BCPL vs. OILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILT
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- 34.29%
- 6M
- 28.46%
- 1Y
- 49.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCPL vs. OILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.67% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 33.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and OILT is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. OILT — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
OILT
BCPL vs. OILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPL | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. OILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum OILT drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and OILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -35.21% | +32.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -9.37% | +8.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -12.92% | +11.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.69% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. OILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 27.96% | -23.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 28.70% | -24.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 28.70% | -24.68% |
BCPL vs. OILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than OILT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. OILT - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than OILT's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.45% | 3.12% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and OILT have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BCPL.
OILT has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.56% for BCPL.
BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while OILT is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.35% for OILT.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and OILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer