BCPL vs. KDRN
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and KDRN (Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for KDRN.
Performance
BCPL vs. KDRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDRN
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCPL vs. KDRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.06% |
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and KDRN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. KDRN — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KDRN
BCPL vs. KDRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCPL | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. KDRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum KDRN drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and KDRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -15.29% | +12.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.01% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -4.67% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. KDRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01% | 3.36% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.01% | 6.53% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.01% | 6.53% | -2.52% |
BCPL vs. KDRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than KDRN's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. KDRN - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than KDRN's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF | 3.34% | 2.54% | 2.83% | 2.84% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and KDRN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for KDRN.
KDRN has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 1.94% for BCPL.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Kingsbarn. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 1.09% for KDRN.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and KDRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer