KDRN vs. FTRB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KDRN (Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF) and FTRB (Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KDRN returned 2.32% vs 2.46% for FTRB. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KDRN charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FTRB.

Performance

KDRN vs. FTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDRN achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than FTRB's -0.51% return.

KDRN

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 1Y: 2.32%
• 3Y*: 3.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.74%

FTRB

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.04%
• 6M: -0.65%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 1Y: 2.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	$3.86M	$3.02M	$2.96M
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF	$651.27	$411.35	$499.24

KDRN vs. FTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF	0.78%	4.65%	1.70%
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	-0.51%	7.60%	2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between KDRN and FTRB is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2024	0.73

The correlation between KDRN and FTRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KDRN vs. FTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KDRN

KDRN Risk / Return Rank: 29
KDRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
KDRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
KDRN Omega Ratio Rank: 27
KDRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
KDRN Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FTRB

FTRB Risk / Return Rank: 34
FTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KDRN vs. FTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KDRN	FTRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	0.91	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	1.32	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.16	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.14	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.40	2.96	-0.56

KDRN vs. FTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the FTRB Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDRN and FTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KDRN vs. FTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDRN drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, which is greater than FTRB's maximum drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDRN and FTRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KDRN	FTRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.29%	-4.83%	-10.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.77%	-2.80%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-2.15%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-1.30%	-3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.08%	-0.13%

Volatility

KDRN vs. FTRB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) is 0.55%, while Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that KDRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KDRN	FTRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	0.86%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	2.78%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38%	3.52%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.50%	4.49%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.50%	4.49%	+2.01%

KDRN vs. FTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDRN has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FTRB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

KDRN vs. FTRB - Dividend Comparison

KDRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than FTRB's 4.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	4.40%	4.46%	4.40%	0.00%	0.00%
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF	3.35%	2.54%	2.83%	2.84%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KDRN and FTRB in my portfolio?

KDRN and FTRB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KDRN or FTRB?

FTRB has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to KDRN (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDRN dropped -15.29% vs FTRB's -4.83%.

Which ETF is better, KDRN or FTRB?

On 1-year performance, FTRB leads with 2.46% vs 2.32% for KDRN. On fees, FTRB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, KDRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KDRN or FTRB?

Over the 1-year period, FTRB has performed better with a 2.46% return vs 2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KDRN or FTRB?

FTRB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for KDRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KDRN or FTRB?

FTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.35% for KDRN.

What is the main difference between KDRN and FTRB?

They also come from different issuers: Kingsbarn and Federated. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for KDRN and 0.39% for FTRB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.