BCPL vs. IEO
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and IEO (iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while IEO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index. BCPL is actively managed, while IEO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IEO.
Performance
BCPL vs. IEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 34.23%
- 6M
- 25.78%
- 1Y
- 43.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
BCPL vs. IEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.67% |
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 32.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and IEO is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. IEO — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
IEO
BCPL vs. IEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPL | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.17 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. IEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum IEO drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and IEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -79.17% | +76.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -7.55% | +6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -26.27% | +25.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.30% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. IEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 25.11% | -21.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 30.53% | -26.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 34.99% | -30.97% |
BCPL vs. IEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IEO's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. IEO - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than IEO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.97% | 2.61% | 2.63% | 3.00% | 3.77% | 2.62% | 3.17% | 1.85% | 1.67% | 0.94% | 0.98% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and IEO have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IEO.
IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.56% for BCPL.
BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while IEO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.42% for IEO.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and IEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer