PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCPL vs. IEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCPL vs. IEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BCPL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.34%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IEO

1D
-0.27%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
34.23%
6M
25.78%
1Y
43.06%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCPL vs. IEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCPL and IEO is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCPL vs. IEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCPL

IEO
IEO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCPL vs. IEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCPL vs. IEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCPLIEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.17

+0.26

Drawdowns

BCPL vs. IEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum IEO drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and IEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCPLIEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-79.17%

+76.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-7.55%

+6.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-26.27%

+25.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

Volatility

BCPL vs. IEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCPLIEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

25.11%

-21.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

30.53%

-26.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

34.99%

-30.97%

BCPL vs. IEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IEO's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCPL vs. IEO - Dividend Comparison

BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than IEO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCPL
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF
1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.97%2.61%2.63%3.00%3.77%2.62%3.17%1.85%1.67%0.94%0.98%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCPL and IEO have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IEO.

IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.56% for BCPL.

BCPL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while IEO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.42% for IEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCPL and IEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer