BCPIX vs. BINCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX).
BCPIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Dec 28, 2007. BINCX is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 31, 2013.
Performance
BCPIX vs. BINCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCPIX vs. BINCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPIX Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund | -0.55% | 6.71% | 1.98% | 6.70% | -10.78% | -0.34% | 5.77% | 6.65% | -0.45% | 2.74% |
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | -3.51% | 44.63% | 22.20% | 37.99% | -9.36% | 18.22% | 3.79% | 6.06% | -20.76% | 10.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCPIX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than BINCX's -3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BCPIX has underperformed BINCX with an annualized return of 1.90%, while BINCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.
BCPIX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
BINCX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.67%
- YTD
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 26.54%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCPIX vs. BINCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BINCX's 1.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCPIX vs. BINCX — Risk / Return Rank
BCPIX
BINCX
BCPIX vs. BINCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCPIX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.85 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 2.41 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.05 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 8.08 | -2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPIX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.85 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 1.28 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.69 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.63 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPIX and BINCX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BCPIX vs. BINCX - Dividend Comparison
BCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than BINCX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPIX Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund | 4.10% | 4.32% | 3.67% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 1.89% | 1.76% | 2.77% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.84% | 2.72% |
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.54% | 2.45% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 0.60% | 0.21% | 3.77% | 7.83% | 3.75% | 3.04% |
Drawdowns
BCPIX vs. BINCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPIX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, smaller than the maximum BINCX drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPIX and BINCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPIX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.43% | -48.15% | +25.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -11.66% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.19% | -31.97% | +16.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.19% | -48.15% | +32.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -11.40% | +9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -9.44% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 2.95% | -2.09% |
Volatility
BCPIX vs. BINCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) is 1.42%, while Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that BCPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BINCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCPIX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 5.28% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 9.07% | -6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97% | 13.38% | -9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 13.74% | -8.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 14.16% | -10.00% |