BCPC vs. DHR
BCPC (Balchem Corporation) and DHR (Danaher Corporation) are both stocks. BCPC operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while DHR operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BCPC returned 10.76%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for DHR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCPC vs. DHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCPC achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -22.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BCPC having a 10.76% annualized return and DHR not far ahead at 10.97%.
BCPC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- -5.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
DHR
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- -22.04%
- 6M
- -21.78%
- 1Y
- -6.64%
- 3Y*
- -4.53%
- 5Y*
- -3.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
BCPC vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 2.13% | -5.33% | 10.15% | 22.80% | -27.15% | 46.90% | 13.96% | 30.38% | -2.19% | -3.46% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | -22.04% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPC and DHR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.22 |
The correlation between BCPC and DHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCPC:
$5.06B
DHR:
$126.65B
BCPC:
$4.86
DHR:
$5.17
BCPC:
32.21
DHR:
34.46
BCPC:
4.82
DHR:
5.13
BCPC:
3.93
DHR:
2.39
BCPC:
$1.06B
DHR:
$24.78B
BCPC:
$383.55M
DHR:
$15.04B
BCPC:
$259.05M
DHR:
$6.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPC vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank
BCPC
DHR
BCPC vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCPC | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.98 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | -0.20 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | -0.50 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPC | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | -0.24 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | -0.12 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.43 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.64 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
BCPC vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPC drawdown since its inception was -85.26%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPC and DHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPC | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.26% | -45.80% | -39.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.52% | -32.97% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -41.72% | +18.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -43.81% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.72% | -43.81% | +7.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.54% | -38.20% | +23.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.47% | -10.21% | -12.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 13.26% | -5.47% |
Volatility
BCPC vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is 3.81%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that BCPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPC | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 7.84% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.30% | 18.84% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.10% | 27.70% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 27.92% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.81% | 25.48% | +1.33% |
Dividends
BCPC vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison
BCPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than DHR's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 0.61% | 0.63% | 0.53% | 0.80% | 0.58% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.56% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.76% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
Financials
BCPC vs. DHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balchem Corporation and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCPC vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison
BCPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.08M and revenue of 270.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
DHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.
BCPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported an operating income of 55.63M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
DHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.
BCPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a net income of 40.29M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
DHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPC and DHR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHR has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to BCPC (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCPC dropped -85.26% vs DHR's -45.80%.
DHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCPC and DHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer