PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCPC vs. ALG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BCPC vs. ALG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCPC achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than ALG's -3.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BCPC has outperformed ALG with an annualized return of 11.38%, while ALG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.


BCPC

1D
0.94%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.19%
6M
5.18%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
11.38%

ALG

1D
3.32%
1M
7.60%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
-6.06%
1Y
-24.46%
3Y*
-3.80%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCPC vs. ALG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
8.19%-5.33%10.15%22.80%-27.15%46.90%13.96%30.38%-2.19%-3.46%
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
-3.53%-9.12%-11.07%49.19%-3.27%7.09%10.41%63.18%-31.19%49.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BCPC and ALG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 1993

0.27

The correlation between BCPC and ALG shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCPC:

$5.36B

ALG:

$1.95B

EPS

BCPC:

$4.86

ALG:

$8.37

PE Ratio

BCPC:

34.13

ALG:

19.28

PEG Ratio

BCPC:

2.65

ALG:

2.29

PS Ratio

BCPC:

5.10

ALG:

1.20

PB Ratio

BCPC:

4.17

ALG:

1.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCPC:

$1.06B

ALG:

$1.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCPC:

$383.55M

ALG:

$399.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

BCPC:

$259.05M

ALG:

$232.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCPC vs. ALG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCPC
BCPC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BCPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCPC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BCPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCPC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ALG
ALG Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ALG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ALG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALG Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCPC vs. ALG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCPCALGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.88

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.68

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

-1.12

+1.73

BCPC vs. ALG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the ALG Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCPC and ALG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCPC vs. ALG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPC drawdown since its inception was -85.26%, which is greater than ALG's maximum drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPC and ALG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCPCALGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.26%

-69.23%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.03%

-36.30%

+21.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-36.30%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-36.30%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.72%

-42.47%

+5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-30.21%

+20.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.45%

-19.65%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.29%

21.92%

-14.63%

Volatility

BCPC vs. ALG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is 4.77%, while Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that BCPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCPCALGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

6.83%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

27.31%

-11.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

31.61%

-10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.11%

29.53%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.79%

31.22%

-4.43%

Dividends

BCPC vs. ALG - Dividend Comparison

BCPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than ALG's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
0.79%0.71%0.56%0.42%0.51%0.38%0.38%0.38%0.57%0.35%0.47%0.61%
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
0.58%0.63%0.53%0.80%0.58%0.38%0.50%0.51%0.60%0.52%0.45%0.56%

Financials

BCPC vs. ALG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balchem Corporation and Alamo Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00M20222023202420252026
270.71M
417.15M
(BCPC) Total Revenue
(ALG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BCPC vs. ALG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Balchem Corporation and Alamo Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
37.3%
25.1%
Portfolio components
BCPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.08M and revenue of 270.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.

ALG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 104.81M and revenue of 417.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

BCPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported an operating income of 55.63M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

ALG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported an operating income of 42.16M and revenue of 417.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

BCPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a net income of 40.29M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

ALG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a net income of 29.18M and revenue of 417.15M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCPC and ALG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to BCPC (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCPC dropped -85.26% vs ALG's -69.23%.

BCPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCPC and ALG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer