PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BCPC vs. ASH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BCPCASH
YTD Return15.97%2.49%
1Y Return43.70%11.90%
3Y Return (Ann)2.77%-3.11%
5Y Return (Ann)11.05%3.35%
10Y Return (Ann)11.06%6.23%
Sharpe Ratio1.960.50
Sortino Ratio2.830.97
Omega Ratio1.331.13
Calmar Ratio1.480.39
Martin Ratio9.711.69
Ulcer Index4.76%8.26%
Daily Std Dev23.61%27.87%
Max Drawdown-85.24%-91.64%
Current Drawdown-4.98%-22.61%

Fundamentals


BCPCASH
Market Cap$5.61B$4.17B
EPS$3.76$3.44
PE Ratio45.8824.80
PEG Ratio4.67-1.36
Total Revenue (TTM)$942.38M$1.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)$324.86M$364.00M
EBITDA (TTM)$246.40M$253.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between BCPC and ASH is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BCPC vs. ASH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BCPC achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than ASH's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BCPC has outperformed ASH with an annualized return of 11.06%, while ASH has yielded a comparatively lower 6.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.95%
-12.21%
BCPC
ASH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCPC vs. ASH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 9.71, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.71
ASH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASH, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASH, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASH, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASH, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASH, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.69

BCPC vs. ASH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the ASH Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCPC and ASH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.96
0.50
BCPC
ASH

Dividends

BCPC vs. ASH - Dividend Comparison

BCPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than ASH's 1.85% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
0.69%0.80%0.58%0.38%0.50%0.51%0.60%0.52%0.45%0.56%0.45%0.44%
ASH
Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
1.85%1.77%1.21%1.09%1.39%1.40%1.37%1.22%1.43%1.47%1.14%1.28%

Drawdowns

BCPC vs. ASH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPC drawdown since its inception was -85.24%, smaller than the maximum ASH drawdown of -91.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPC and ASH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.98%
-22.61%
BCPC
ASH

Volatility

BCPC vs. ASH - Volatility Comparison

Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) have volatilities of 5.62% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.62%
5.41%
BCPC
ASH

Financials

BCPC vs. ASH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balchem Corporation and Ashland Global Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items