BCPC vs. ASH
BCPC (Balchem Corporation) and ASH (Ashland Global Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, BCPC returned 10.71%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for ASH. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BCPC vs. ASH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCPC achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than ASH's 25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BCPC has outperformed ASH with an annualized return of 10.71%, while ASH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.
BCPC
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 10.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.16%
ASH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 20.39%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 48.04%
- 3Y*
- -5.16%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $63.51M | $50.14M | $63.72M | |
| $32.91M | $36.10M | $36.11M |
BCPC vs. ASH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 9.26% | -5.33% | 10.15% | 22.80% | -27.15% | 46.90% | 13.96% | 30.38% | -2.19% | -3.46% |
ASH Ashland Global Holdings Inc. | 25.50% | -15.40% | -13.71% | -20.24% | 1.14% | 37.67% | 5.05% | 9.42% | 0.90% | 34.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPC and ASH is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1986 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BCPC and ASH shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCPC:
$5.38B
ASH:
$3.33B
BCPC:
$5.08
ASH:
$1.61
BCPC:
33.01
ASH:
45.14
BCPC:
2.56
ASH:
0.50
BCPC:
5.00
ASH:
1.81
BCPC:
4.15
ASH:
1.79
BCPC:
$1.09B
ASH:
$1.84B
BCPC:
$394.12M
ASH:
$581.00M
BCPC:
$254.20M
ASH:
$206.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPC vs. ASH — Risk / Return Rank
BCPC
ASH
BCPC vs. ASH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCPC | ASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.87 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | 4.63 | -3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCPC vs. ASH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPC drawdown since its inception was -85.26%, smaller than the maximum ASH drawdown of -91.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPC and ASH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPC | ASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.26% | -91.64% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.03% | -24.17% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -53.26% | +30.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -57.29% | +23.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.72% | -57.29% | +20.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.57% | -30.82% | +22.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -17.66% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 9.74% | -1.95% |
Volatility
BCPC vs. ASH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is 5.72%, while Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that BCPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPC | ASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 9.88% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.70% | 31.36% | -16.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 39.17% | -18.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 31.77% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 30.11% | -3.39% |
Dividends
BCPC vs. ASH - Dividend Comparison
BCPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than ASH's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASH Ashland Global Holdings Inc. | 2.29% | 2.81% | 2.24% | 1.77% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 1.39% | 1.40% | 1.37% | 88.83% | 1.43% | 1.47% |
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 0.57% | 0.63% | 0.53% | 0.80% | 0.58% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.56% |
Financials
BCPC vs. ASH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balchem Corporation and Ashland Global Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCPC vs. ASH - Profitability Comparison
BCPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a gross profit of 103.68M and revenue of 284.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.
ASH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.00M and revenue of 497.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.2%.
BCPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Balchem Corporation reported an operating income of 59.22M and revenue of 284.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.
ASH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 43.00M and revenue of 497.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
BCPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a net income of 44.62M and revenue of 284.00M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
ASH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 38.00M and revenue of 497.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPC and ASH have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASH has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to BCPC (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCPC dropped -85.26% vs ASH's -91.64%.
ASH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCPC and ASH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer