PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCOR vs. ETCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCOR vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly higher than ETCG's -35.40% return.


BCOR

1D
-2.77%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
-9.89%
1Y
-17.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETCG

1D
1.15%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
-35.40%
6M
-44.65%
1Y
-51.42%
3Y*
-10.63%
5Y*
-35.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOR vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCOR
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF
-2.23%4.14%
ETCG
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)
-35.40%-14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BCOR and ETCG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.52

The correlation between BCOR and ETCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCOR vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOR
BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ETCG
ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOR vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCORETCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.86

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

-0.78

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

-1.19

+0.43

BCOR vs. ETCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is higher than the ETCG Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOR and ETCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCORETCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

-0.83

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.18

+0.22

Drawdowns

BCOR vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and ETCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCORETCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.99%

-96.59%

+53.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.99%

-66.46%

+23.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.84%

-95.33%

+64.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-82.67%

+64.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.12%

43.41%

-20.29%

Volatility

BCOR vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) is 10.49%, while Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a volatility of 11.37%. This indicates that BCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCORETCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

11.37%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.45%

36.81%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.24%

62.03%

-20.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.93%

94.03%

-51.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.93%

115.33%

-72.40%

BCOR vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCOR vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison

BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, while ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCOR and ETCG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETCG has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to BCOR (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOR dropped -42.99% vs ETCG's -96.59%.

On 1-year performance, BCOR leads with -17.33% vs -51.42% for ETCG. On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BCOR has been the lower-risk option at 10.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BCOR has performed better with a -17.33% return vs -51.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

BCOR has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.

BCOR is categorized as Blockchain, while ETCG is Cryptocurrency. BCOR tracks Indxx Bitcoin Adopters Index, while ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC). Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BCOR and 2.50% for ETCG.

BCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCOR and ETCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer