PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCOR vs. DECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCOR vs. DECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than DECO's 61.26% return.


BCOR

1D
-2.60%
1M
-7.05%
6M
-17.04%
YTD
-16.45%
1Y
-30.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-9.47%

DECO

1D
-1.75%
1M
-3.53%
6M
43.24%
YTD
61.26%
1Y
103.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
79.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.33K$9.47K$14.95K
$81.73K$85.27K$116.73K

BCOR vs. DECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCOR and DECO is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

0.79

The correlation between BCOR and DECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

BCOR vs. DECO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BCOR
DECO

Consumer Cyclical

36.0%

-

Financial Services

29.0%
51.7%

Technology

25.5%
43.9%

Communication Services

7.7%

-

Industrials

1.0%
4.4%

Energy

0.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

BCOR
36.0%
DECO

-

Financial Services

BCOR
29.0%
DECO
51.7%

Technology

BCOR
25.5%
DECO
43.9%

Communication Services

BCOR
7.7%
DECO

-

Industrials

BCOR
1.0%
DECO
4.4%

Energy

BCOR
0.5%
DECO

-

Consumer Defensive

BCOR
0.2%
DECO

-

Healthcare

BCOR
0.2%
DECO

-

Utilities

BCOR
0.2%
DECO

-

Basic Materials

BCOR

-

DECO
1.8%

Real Estate

BCOR

-

DECO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCOR vs. DECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCOR
BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

DECO
DECO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCOR vs. DECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCORDECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.31

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

3.63

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

9.69

-10.94

BCOR vs. DECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the DECO Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOR and DECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCOR vs. DECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, smaller than the maximum DECO drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and DECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCORDECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.99%

-47.71%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.99%

-25.60%

-17.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.90%

-11.66%

-29.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-11.23%

-9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.14%

9.58%

+17.56%

Volatility

BCOR vs. DECO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) is 12.98%, while State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) has a volatility of 19.07%. This indicates that BCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCORDECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.98%

19.07%

-6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.02%

36.72%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.11%

47.28%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.51%

51.85%

-8.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.51%

51.85%

-8.34%

BCOR vs. DECO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DECO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCOR vs. DECO - Dividend Comparison

BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than DECO's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BCOR
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF
3.77%3.10%0.00%
DECO
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
0.72%1.16%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCOR and DECO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECO has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to BCOR (12.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOR dropped -42.99% vs DECO's -47.71%.

On 1-year performance, DECO leads with 103.84% vs -30.47% for BCOR. On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BCOR has been the lower-risk option at 12.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DECO has performed better with a 103.84% return vs -30.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.

BCOR has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.72% for DECO.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BCOR and 0.65% for DECO.

DECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCOR and DECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer