BCOR vs. CIFU
BCOR (Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCOR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Adopters Index, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. BCOR is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCOR charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.
Performance
BCOR vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 89.23% return.
BCOR
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- -11.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU
- 1D
- 17.92%
- 1M
- 113.70%
- YTD
- 89.23%
- 6M
- 21.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCOR vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF | 0.56% | 2.88% |
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 89.23% | -6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCOR and CIFU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCOR vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank
BCOR
CIFU
BCOR vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCOR | CIFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCOR | CIFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.98 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
BCOR vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and CIFU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCOR | CIFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.99% | -77.20% | +34.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.87% | -9.89% | -18.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -45.63% | +27.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.04% | — | — |
Volatility
BCOR vs. CIFU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCOR | CIFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.19% | 206.99% | -165.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.92% | 206.99% | -164.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.92% | 206.99% | -164.07% |
BCOR vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCOR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCOR vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison
BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, while CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF | 3.08% | 3.10% |
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCOR and CIFU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
BCOR has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.
BCOR is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BCOR and 1.50% for CIFU.
Find the right allocation for BCOR and CIFU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer