BCI vs. CMDY
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY).
BCI and CMDY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. CMDY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018.
Performance
BCI vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCI vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 23.30% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -10.44% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 21.23% | 15.81% | 5.43% | -9.33% | 14.55% | 26.38% | 1.15% | 4.96% | -11.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 23.30% return, which is significantly higher than CMDY's 21.23% return.
BCI
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 26.39%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCI vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCI vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
BCI
CMDY
BCI vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.75 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 2.31 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.00 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 9.38 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.75 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.54 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCI and CMDY is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCI vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.37%, more than CMDY's 10.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.37% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.64% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BCI vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, roughly equal to the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and CMDY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -31.19% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -9.57% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.50% | -26.56% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.97% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -13.38% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.06% | +0.31% |
Volatility
BCI vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) at 6.76%. This indicates that BCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.76% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 13.02% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 16.43% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 15.63% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 14.54% | +1.03% |