BCHP vs. PWB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) and PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BCHP is actively managed, while PWB is passively managed. Over the past year, BCHP returned 5.90% vs 45.84% for PWB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCHP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PWB.

Performance

BCHP vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHP achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's 28.68% return.

BCHP

• 1D: -2.07%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 6M: -0.96%
• 1Y: 5.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWB

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 10.94%
• YTD: 28.68%
• 6M: 28.89%
• 1Y: 45.84%
• 3Y*: 34.49%
• 5Y*: 18.36%
• 10Y*: 18.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHP vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	-0.40%	10.20%	20.55%	12.89%
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	28.68%	24.94%	31.04%	9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHP and PWB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.84

The correlation between BCHP and PWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

BCHP vs. PWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BCHP	PWB
Technology	34.2%	44.6%
Financial Services	23.4%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	18.8%	5.2%
Communication Services	13.4%	10.9%
Industrials	7.3%	15.9%
Healthcare	3.0%	3.6%
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.4%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

BCHP vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHP

BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 14
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 14

PWB

PWB Risk / Return Rank: 74
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHP vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCHP	PWB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	2.50	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	3.23	-2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.42	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	3.80	-3.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.05	16.42	-15.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCHP vs. PWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the PWB Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHP and PWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCHP	PWB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	2.50	-2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.61	+0.28

Drawdowns

BCHP vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum PWB drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and PWB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHP	PWB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.56%	-52.58%	+34.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.12%	-12.11%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	0.00%	-3.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-8.23%	+5.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.64%	2.80%	+2.84%

Volatility

BCHP vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) is 4.27%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that BCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHP	PWB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	5.38%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	15.00%	-2.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	18.47%	-2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	20.99%	-4.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	20.71%	-3.85%

BCHP vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHP vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCHP nor PWB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.02%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.37%	0.31%	0.04%	0.21%	0.58%	0.97%	0.54%	0.82%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHP and PWB in my portfolio?

BCHP and PWB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCHP or PWB?

PWB has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to BCHP (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHP dropped -18.56% vs PWB's -52.58%.

Which ETF is better, BCHP or PWB?

On 1-year performance, PWB leads with 45.84% vs 5.90% for BCHP. On fees, PWB is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, BCHP has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCHP or PWB?

Over the 1-year period, PWB has performed better with a 45.84% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHP or PWB?

PWB is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHP or PWB?

BCHP and PWB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BCHP and PWB?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BCHP and 0.56% for PWB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.