PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCHP vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCHP vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCHP vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
-12.70%10.20%20.55%12.89%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
-3.17%10.23%17.09%5.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHP achieves a -12.70% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's -3.17% return.


BCHP

1D
3.39%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
-12.70%
6M
-13.06%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OUSA

1D
1.44%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BCHP vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BCHP vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHP
BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHP vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCHPOUSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

0.45

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

0.74

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.10

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

0.75

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.31

3.10

-2.79

BCHP vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHP and OUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCHPOUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

0.45

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.66

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between BCHP and OUSA is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BCHP vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
0.00%0.00%1.02%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.46%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Drawdowns

BCHP vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and OUSA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHPOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-33.12%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.12%

-9.80%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.19%

-6.65%

-8.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-3.53%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

2.39%

+2.86%

Volatility

BCHP vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that BCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCHPOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

3.78%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

7.27%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.27%

13.88%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

13.31%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

15.15%

+1.68%