BCHI vs. MSTZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BCHI (GMO Beyond China ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHI is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by GMO, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCHI returned 36.96% vs 150.38% for MSTZ. Their -0.37 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHI achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -32.77% return.

BCHI

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -4.22%
• 6M: 12.35%
• YTD: 20.06%
• 1Y: 36.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 33.03%

MSTZ

• 1D: -3.35%
• 1M: 3.78%
• 6M: -35.30%
• YTD: -32.77%
• 1Y: 150.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -86.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	$56.39K	$51.68K	$47.34K
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	$99.07M	$124.74M	$178.48M

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	20.06%	26.33%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-32.77%	-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHI and MSTZ is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	-0.37

Return for Risk

BCHI vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCHI

BCHI Risk / Return Rank: 65
BCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 62

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 46
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCHI	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.01	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.01	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	1.78	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	3.30	+4.20

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHI and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHI drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHI and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHI	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.01%	-99.38%	+83.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.01%	-84.89%	+68.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.64%	-97.71%	+85.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-94.63%	+91.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	45.77%	-40.82%

Volatility

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) is 9.11%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 33.58%. This indicates that BCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHI	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	33.58%	-24.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.63%	134.23%	-111.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.26%	149.52%	-125.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.92%	169.71%	-146.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.92%	169.71%	-146.79%

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHI vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

BCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.19%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	25.19%	3.67%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHI and MSTZ in my portfolio?

BCHI and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCHI or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (33.58%) compared to BCHI (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHI dropped -16.01% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, BCHI or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 150.38% vs 36.96% for BCHI. On fees, BCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BCHI has been the lower-risk option at 9.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCHI or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 150.38% return vs 36.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHI or MSTZ?

BCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHI or MSTZ?

BCHI has the higher dividend yield at 25.19%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between BCHI and MSTZ?

BCHI is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: GMO and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHI and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.