BCHI vs. BBEM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BCHI (GMO Beyond China ETF) and BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. BCHI is actively managed, while BBEM is passively managed. Over the past year, BCHI returned 36.96% vs 34.07% for BBEM. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBEM.

Performance

BCHI vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHI achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly higher than BBEM's 17.16% return.

BCHI

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -4.22%
• 6M: 12.35%
• YTD: 20.06%
• 1Y: 36.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 33.03%

BBEM

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -2.28%
• 6M: 9.39%
• YTD: 17.16%
• 1Y: 34.07%
• 3Y*: 17.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$4.42M	$2.79M	$2.95M
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	$56.39K	$51.68K	$47.34K

BCHI vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	20.06%	26.33%
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	17.16%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHI and BBEM is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.87

The correlation between BCHI and BBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BCHI vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCHI

BCHI Risk / Return Rank: 65
BCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BBEM

BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 62
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCHI vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCHI	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.40	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.94	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.27	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.50	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	7.64	-0.14

BCHI vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHI and BBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCHI vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHI drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum BBEM drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHI and BBEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHI	BBEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.01%	-17.42%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.01%	-13.37%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.64%	-9.54%	-3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-3.84%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	4.37%	+0.58%

Volatility

BCHI vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

GMO Beyond China ETF (BCHI) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) have volatilities of 9.11% and 8.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHI	BBEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	8.89%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.63%	21.92%	+0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.26%	23.91%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.92%	18.86%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.92%	18.86%	+4.06%

BCHI vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHI vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

BCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.19%, more than BBEM's 4.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	4.95%	5.86%	2.73%	1.94%
BCHI GMO Beyond China ETF	25.19%	3.67%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHI and BBEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BCHI and BBEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BCHI or BBEM?

BCHI has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to BBEM (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHI dropped -16.01% vs BBEM's -17.42%.

Which ETF is better, BCHI or BBEM?

On 1-year performance, BCHI leads with 36.96% vs 34.07% for BBEM. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCHI or BBEM?

Over the 1-year period, BCHI has performed better with a 36.96% return vs 34.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHI or BBEM?

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHI or BBEM?

BCHI has the higher dividend yield at 25.19%, compared with 4.95% for BBEM.

What is the main difference between BCHI and BBEM?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHI and 0.15% for BBEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.