BCGS vs. WBIF
BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.
Performance
BCGS vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
BCGS vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 8.30% |
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGS and WBIF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGS vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank
BCGS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WBIF
BCGS vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCGS | WBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCGS vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and WBIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGS | WBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -20.29% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -0.66% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -7.70% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
BCGS vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGS | WBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 12.50% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 12.90% | +9.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 12.36% | +10.15% |
BCGS vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGS vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison
BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than WBIF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.17% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 2.59% | 0.09% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 0.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGS and WBIF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCGS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCGS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.
WBIF has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.
They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 1.25% for WBIF.
Find the right allocation for BCGS and WBIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer