BCGS vs. NZAC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BCGS is actively managed, while NZAC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.

Performance

BCGS vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCGS

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NZAC

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 4.67%
• 1Y: 18.44%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 9.09%
• 10Y*: 12.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	8.30%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and NZAC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

BCGS vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 43
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGS vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCGS	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.36	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.66	—

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCGS	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-33.72%	+26.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-3.72%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-5.31%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCGS	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.51%	13.69%	+8.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.51%	16.94%	+5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.51%	17.13%	+5.38%

BCGS vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCGS vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than NZAC's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.10%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCGS and NZAC in my portfolio?

BCGS and NZAC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCGS or NZAC?

On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCGS or NZAC?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCGS or NZAC?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

What is the main difference between BCGS and NZAC?

They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.12% for NZAC.