BCGS vs. GVAL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.

Performance

BCGS vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCGS

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GVAL

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: 15.95%
• 6M: 15.40%
• 1Y: 39.29%
• 3Y*: 26.91%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	8.30%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and GVAL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

BCGS vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 81
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGS vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCGS	GVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.43	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.04	—

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and GVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCGS	GVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-46.82%	+39.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-3.51%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-13.82%	+11.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCGS	GVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.51%	15.62%	+6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.51%	18.60%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.51%	19.01%	+3.50%

BCGS vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCGS vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than GVAL's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.46%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCGS and GVAL in my portfolio?

BCGS and GVAL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCGS or GVAL?

On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCGS or GVAL?

GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCGS or GVAL?

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

What is the main difference between BCGS and GVAL?

They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.64% for GVAL.