PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCGDX vs. GWOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCGDX achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than GWOAX's 15.86% return. Over the past 10 years, BCGDX has underperformed GWOAX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while GWOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.


BCGDX

1D
-0.53%
1M
2.41%
YTD
8.04%
6M
9.22%
1Y
24.68%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
11.51%

GWOAX

1D
-0.44%
1M
4.06%
YTD
15.86%
6M
17.59%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCGDX
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund
8.04%30.23%16.71%14.46%-8.62%18.78%7.06%26.17%-12.14%18.97%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
15.86%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGDX and GWOAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.92

The correlation between BCGDX and GWOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCGDX vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGDX
BCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCGDXGWOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.55

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

4.27

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

17.06

-5.44

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCGDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the GWOAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCGDX and GWOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCGDXGWOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.03

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.71

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.74

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.47

+0.19

Drawdowns

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGDX drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum GWOAX drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGDX and GWOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCGDXGWOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-49.84%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-8.78%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-16.11%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-26.21%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-35.28%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.44%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-9.00%

+4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.19%

-0.06%

Volatility

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison

Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that BCGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCGDXGWOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.26%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

9.47%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

12.40%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

15.22%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

16.50%

-0.59%

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCGDX vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison

BCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than GWOAX's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCGDX
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund
4.39%4.77%4.23%1.84%5.11%8.48%1.45%2.24%1.53%3.44%1.99%1.68%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
3.85%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCGDX and GWOAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCGDX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to GWOAX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCGDX dropped -35.90% vs GWOAX's -49.84%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCGDX and GWOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer