BCGDX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
BCGDX is managed by Blue Current Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2014. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
BCGDX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCGDX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGDX Blue Current Global Dividend Fund | -2.23% | 30.23% | 16.71% | 14.46% | -8.62% | 18.78% | 7.06% | 26.17% | -12.14% | 18.97% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCGDX achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BCGDX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
BCGDX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCGDX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCGDX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
BCGDX
FGIAX
BCGDX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCGDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.75 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.26 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.61 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 12.12 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCGDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.75 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.58 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.42 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGDX and FGIAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCGDX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
BCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGDX Blue Current Global Dividend Fund | 4.58% | 4.77% | 4.23% | 1.84% | 5.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 2.24% | 1.53% | 3.44% | 1.99% | 1.68% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
BCGDX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGDX drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGDX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -49.35% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.96% | -8.29% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -21.08% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | -38.02% | +2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -3.78% | -4.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -7.22% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.78% | +0.48% |
Volatility
BCGDX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that BCGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCGDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 4.05% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 7.09% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 12.28% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 13.08% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 15.17% | +0.69% |