PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BCGDX vs. KNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BCGDX and KNG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

BCGDX vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.97%
-0.08%
BCGDX
KNG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCGDX:

1.82

KNG:

0.93

Sortino Ratio

BCGDX:

2.45

KNG:

1.36

Omega Ratio

BCGDX:

1.33

KNG:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

BCGDX:

3.15

KNG:

0.99

Martin Ratio

BCGDX:

9.46

KNG:

2.77

Ulcer Index

BCGDX:

2.07%

KNG:

3.15%

Daily Std Dev

BCGDX:

10.75%

KNG:

9.36%

Max Drawdown

BCGDX:

-35.93%

KNG:

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

BCGDX:

-0.83%

KNG:

-4.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCGDX achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.74% return.


BCGDX

YTD

7.52%

1M

2.32%

6M

5.14%

1Y

19.07%

5Y*

8.68%

10Y*

7.21%

KNG

YTD

2.74%

1M

0.32%

6M

0.62%

1Y

8.23%

5Y*

7.82%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BCGDX vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


BCGDX
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund
Expense ratio chart for BCGDX: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for KNG: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCGDX vs. KNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCGDX is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCGDX is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCGDX is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCGDX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCGDX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCGDX is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KNG is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KNG is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KNG is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KNG is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KNG is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KNG is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BCGDX vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCGDX, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.820.93
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCGDX, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.451.36
The chart of Omega ratio for BCGDX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.331.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCGDX, currently valued at 3.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.150.99
The chart of Martin ratio for BCGDX, currently valued at 9.46, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.009.462.77
BCGDX
KNG

The current BCGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCGDX and KNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.82
0.93
BCGDX
KNG

Dividends

BCGDX vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

BCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than KNG's 8.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BCGDX
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund
1.84%1.98%1.84%2.00%3.06%1.46%1.61%1.53%1.62%1.99%1.67%0.28%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.15%9.08%5.91%4.01%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BCGDX vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGDX drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, roughly equal to the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGDX and KNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.83%
-4.40%
BCGDX
KNG

Volatility

BCGDX vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.80%
2.91%
BCGDX
KNG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab