BCGDX vs. GAOAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX).
BCGDX is managed by Blue Current Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2014. GAOAX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 31, 2011.
Performance
BCGDX vs. GAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCGDX vs. GAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGDX Blue Current Global Dividend Fund | -2.23% | 30.23% | 16.71% | 14.46% | -8.62% | 18.78% | 7.06% | 26.17% | -12.14% | 18.97% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | -5.28% | 14.68% | 7.91% | 12.69% | -18.74% | 3.60% | 15.29% | 15.95% | -6.07% | 16.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCGDX achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly higher than GAOAX's -5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, BCGDX has outperformed GAOAX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while GAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.
BCGDX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
GAOAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCGDX vs. GAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than GAOAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCGDX vs. GAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
BCGDX
GAOAX
BCGDX vs. GAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCGDX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 0.72 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.06 | +1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 0.82 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 3.42 | +5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCGDX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 0.72 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.16 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.52 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGDX and GAOAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCGDX vs. GAOAX - Dividend Comparison
BCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than GAOAX's 10.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGDX Blue Current Global Dividend Fund | 4.58% | 4.77% | 4.23% | 1.84% | 5.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 2.24% | 1.53% | 3.44% | 1.99% | 1.68% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 10.19% | 10.15% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.62% | 4.61% | 1.54% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
BCGDX vs. GAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGDX drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than GAOAX's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGDX and GAOAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGDX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -29.02% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.96% | -8.95% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -29.02% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | -29.02% | -6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -8.95% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -6.01% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.15% | +0.11% |
Volatility
BCGDX vs. GAOAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) is 4.28%, while JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that BCGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCGDX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 4.64% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 7.42% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 11.46% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 11.02% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 10.80% | +5.06% |